Speed is not synonymous with superficiality
Technology does not automatically make people passive. It shifts effort. What used to take time and effort now happens faster. That is not a regression, but progress – provided we know how to handle it. It is a fundamental misconception that speed equals superficiality; it actually enables us to get to the core of complex issues more quickly, as long as the basic skills are present. In education, for example, we see that more and more young people are using AI to learn better, structure information, or develop new ideas. This requires initiative and critical thinking to filter and validate the enormous stream of generated data for truth and relevance.

AI acts as powerful support in the learning process, provided the user learns to ask critical questions of the system and does not blindly trust the output.
The danger of blind trust in the algorithm
The real problem arises when technology is used thoughtlessly. Without clear frameworks, young people do not learn when AI is a tool and when it is important to think for themselves. This leads to dependency. Not because technology is too smart, but because we fail to provide digital skills and responsible use. The real challenge is to prevent a 'black box' mentality, where a generation accepts the outcome of an algorithm as truth without understanding or questioning the underlying logic.
Also read: Young people who are excluded online often feel abandoned by adults
AI and young people: education as a navigation center
The solution therefore lies not in slowing down technological development, but in better guidance. Parents and schools must actively teach young people how to use technology consciously: when it helps, when it hinders, and what the consequences of excessive convenience are. Digital literacy has become as important as reading and writing. Schools must transform from static sources of knowledge to navigation centers that help young people find their way in a world where information is abundant, but wisdom is scarce.

AI acts as powerful support in the learning process, provided the user learns to ask critical questions of the system.
Economic necessity: the 'war on talent' in 2026
This shift is not a luxury but an economic necessity. At a time when AI takes over executive tasks, human added value shifts to strategic insight, ethical frameworks, and creative problem-solving. If we do not teach young people to be the architects of their own technological ecosystem, we risk a knowledge economy that runs on superficiality instead of innovation. The 'war on talent' in 2026 will no longer be about who has the best tools, but about who dares to ask the deepest questions of those tools.
Also read: What is the place of AI in accounting?
Taking control of our own initiative
This responsibility cannot be postponed. Technology is developing rapidly, and without clear direction, the gap between possibilities and skills is growing. If we do not make choices now, we indeed risk a generation that shows less initiative – not because of technology itself, but due to the lack of education and upbringing around it. In a labor market that will soon be dominated by automation, the ability to ask the right questions and maintain ethical frameworks is the only way to remain relevant as a human professional. In short, technology is not a threat to initiative; unconscious use is.
Also read: AI in marketing: where do you apply it?