Why companies are returning to the office

waarom-bedrijven-terug-naar-kantoor-gaan
By Baaz Editorial

By Baaz Editorial

Tuesday 03 March, 2026 - 07:00
By Baaz Editorial

By Baaz Editorial

Tuesday 03 March, 2026 - 07:00 Read time 1 min 37 sec

Returning to the office strengthens collaboration

Where hybrid working offered flexibility, it is now clear that structural collaboration and engagement are under pressure. Physical presence makes it easier for spontaneous alignment, joint decision-making, and mentoring to take place. Organizations find that these forms of remote interaction are difficult to reproduce.

The return to the office fits within a broader need for coherence and direct communication. Companies that are heavily dependent on team dynamics or knowledge sharing indicate that physical proximity leads to faster decisions and more consistency.

Work culture as a strategic compass

Company culture also proves difficult to safeguard remotely. Especially organizations that value engagement, learning environment, or informal connections find that this is harder to achieve from a distance. The office environment acts again as a catalyst for identity, rhythm, and connection within teams.

Leadership often plays a role here: direct visibility of processes and personnel provides managers with support in uncertain times.

Costs and control over resources

In addition to culture and collaboration, financial considerations come into play. Underutilized real estate is costly. In 2025, 24 percent of companies plan to divest office properties, an increase from 2023 (19%).

Other organizations choose optimization: by concentrating personnel back on-site, existing space is used more efficiently. The option of shortening the workweek, a choice for 31 percent of companies, also indicates renewed cost control.

Recruitment power under pressure

However, the return to the office also has its downsides. According to the research, 23 percent of companies struggle to attract talent due to fixed presence requirements. Flexibility remains an important value for many professionals. Only one in five organizations succeeds in recruiting more broadly through remote or hybrid models.

The danger: rigid policies can lead to a competitive disadvantage in a labor market where talent is becoming scarcer.

The golden mean

Wilfried Teunissen (Unit4) emphasizes that the solution does not lie in black-and-white policies. "The return to the office is understandable, but requires flexibility in execution. Organizations must continue to invest in hybrid tools and process design that allows for customization."

The lesson is clear: it is not about being in the office, but about being effective. Smartly combining physical collaboration with digital support makes organizations resilient and attractive for current and future employees.

Other

Other